Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding hamster

Exploding hamster

By its own admission, this topic is obscure. Simply put: no way is "an obscure in-joke in the early years of [a] Finnish computer magazine" notable. Not in the least. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (The only reason this article exists is for silly parallelism with exploding whale and exploding toad.) zafiroblue05 | Talk 01:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE

Cmon now...an exploding hamster? Get that outta here...Reppin the bay 01:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Nom. --Shane ^{(talk/contrib)} 01:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. After all, detailed obscure topics hurt no one. It is a valid topic. -- Chris ^Ccool2ax _contrib. 02:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Chris —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to MikroBitti as that is the most approprate place for this. Crazynas^t 02:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Chris, also pls define where it falls under WP:NOT I can't really understand where you're coming from, because as far as I can see it doesn't fit under any of the "wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" catergories! -- Librarianofages 02:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]