Talk:Bioscience Resource Project
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bioscience Resource Project article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Articles for creation C‑class ![]() | |||||||||
|
title?
Shouldn't this article be moved to the namespace "Bioscience Resource Project"? Sindinero (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Whitewashing
- The "Controversies" section is obviously written by the BRP themselves, framing "controversies" as being battles that they won on their own terms, in their own words. SO, I removed it with the edit summary "that's not controversy, it's a whitewash". Bafflingly, IjonTichyIjoTichy reverted, saying "content removed for no good reason".
- Perhaps there has been some mistake? Removing propaganda that failed both WP:NPOV and WP:COI is, obviously, a perfectly good reason. IjonTichyIjonTichy, please stop doing this. bobrayner (talk) 01:27, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yet another revert. IjonTichyIjonTichy, quit editwarring and please try to follow WP:NPOV in future. bobrayner (talk) 02:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Bob thank you for posting on the talk page. However, you have only done so after I reverted your POV pushing. In fact you are the done that should learn to follow WP:NPOV. Please learn that on WP it is important to try to build WP: Consensus on the talk page before removing massive amounts of sourced content. Thank you. IjonTichy (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)