Talk:Morphological analysis (problem-solving)
Appearance
![]() | Method engineering (defunct) | |||
|
Exceedingly Dense
This is an interesting, but exceedingly dense and not at all public-user-friendly article. A more public friendly rewrite is probably in order. Ask yourself if the average reader could figure out how to do even a simple Morphological analysis from this article. I think it unlikely. - Vedexent 23:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Diagram Problems
The diagram seems to (I think) make specific references to numbered sections of the article. This is poor design as
- Not all users have the auto-numbering turned on in their preferences. I am one, which is why I'm not 100% sure that these numbers in the diagram are referring to sections, but if they are not then they are meaningless and should be removed anyways.
- The structures of Wikipedia articles are fluid and evolving. There are no guarantees that the sections will remain as initially laid out.