Talk:Exploding Kittens

Board and table games Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Repeated copyvio edits

Several new and IP users have been trying to add exact copies of the game's web site or Kickstarter page. I have been helping with making sure these do not stay in the article. However the addition of the Achievements section and whether they have been reached is factual, and not a WP:COPYVIO so I added that back in. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 16:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the achievements are factual or not, is not the question. They fail a couple of WP guidelines and should be removed. - X201 (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's a fair point for discussion. Which guidelines does that section fail? — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 18:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it fails WP:TRIVIA. SEC (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some quotes from that guideline which make me believe it does not apply to this section:

A trivia section is one that contains a disorganized and "unselective" list.
This guideline does not suggest the inclusion or exclusion of any information; it only gives style recommendations.
Issues of inclusion are addressed by content policies.

The list is organized, specific, and relevant to the way the company is promoting its Kickstarter campaign. The technique is innovative, and therefore I think encyclopedic. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 00:49, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cancelled achievements

Worth adding the cancelled achievements, and the reason why? 109.155.254.243 (talk) 11:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. But I can't find any info on any cancelled achievements. Can you post a link here on talk of what source material you're thinking about so we can have a look at it? — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 12:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]