Talk:CSS framework

Rename front End frameworks

Hi folks,

most of these frameworks offer not only css, but also js plugins. Lets rename it in front end frameworks (following)...? 15:35, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

oppose - that's an article, but it's not this article. If we have content for CSS frameworks, then let's have that as an article and, if necessary, root out entries that fall outside it. CSS on its own is something that can support a presentational framework. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy,

I see your point. But mostly all the well known like Bootstrap or Foundation use JS. Also the big ones provide many features (slideshows, iconfonts, etc) and the smaller ones provide only a grid. I would not know how to seperate all these diffrent "things", CSS frameworks, only Grids, full front end frameworks etc. So, one article with all these frameworks would give you a good overview over all possibilities for web design. VanGore (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy,

I thought about it. Now I think CSS frameworks is the right term. JS usage is mostly additional, but the main parts (grid etc) are css. So I added this to the article. thx & greetz VanGore (talk) 14:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of CSS frameworks twice

Hi folks,

the List of CSS frameworks and the tables Grid systems and Grid generators are doublicate. Can I merge the list into the table? VanGore (talk) 09:31, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No. That would imply that CSS is only useful for grid-based layouts, which is very much untrue and would be a serious POV bias. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy,

of course we have to rename the table heading or create an extra table "grid less". But atm we have so many doublicates (960 grid system, Blueprint, Bluesky grid system, Bootstrap, Cardinal Framework...) VanGore (talk) 16:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

gridsystemgenerator.com

The site does not exist. Has it got deleted or moved?