Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexual transmutation
unsourced original research. Was prodded as such, but tag was removed. -999 (Talk) 15:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per my nom. -999 (Talk) 15:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with the OR. Probably wouldn't be a bad idea to look into other articles tied into this Samael Aun Weor figure. It looks a bit like propaganda OR. 205.157.110.11 15:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.
999, you need only vote once.SynergeticMaggot 16:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC) - Keep. Sounds kooky to me, but external links are provided and google yields plenty of sites discussing this (many, but not all in the context of this Samael Aun Weor character). Scorpiondollprincess 19:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Ekajati 21:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep for now. I am concerned that this process is bypassing some Wikipedia norms; so far this article smells like a drive-by deletion:
- The author, Paul Stone has never been notified of the AfD -- that's supposed to be part of the process.
- There has been no prior discussion of any article flaws on the talk page.
- 999 identified possible copyright issues in a previous edit -- is that still a concern? If so, what are the specifics?
- 999 has also just nominated another article associated with Paul Stone, Gnostic Movement, for deletion, again without any involvement in editing the article or commenting on the talk page. Coincidence? See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnostic Movement
- Alternatives to deletion recommended in "Before nominating an AfD" have not been followed -- no attempts made by 999 to improve the article first. For starters, 999 could put {{fact}} tags on the statements not supported by the external links.--A. B. 04:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)