Talk:Integral of inverse functions
Appearance
![]() | Mathematics C‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
AFC comments
Comment: It looks like a solid article on a notable subject and with enough references. The mathematics is correct, except possibly the paragraph with reference 4 (it seems OK, but I don't have time to check it carefully right now). Ozob (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Comment: this looks like a well formed article with good referencing for a new article. It is ready for main space. --Mark viking (talk) 17:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)