Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behavior theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Silver seren (talk | contribs) at 22:34, 11 December 2014 (Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Behavior theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very badly formed dab page with no acceptable entries. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Badly formatted? So fix it. No acceptable entries? And what kind of criteria is that? It's a helpful disambig page; this should be speedy closed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I see nothing wrong with this disambiguation page. It has a clear topic and three or more articles it links to, meeting the qualifications for such a page. Sure, each of the linked articles could use a single sentence addition giving a bit of explanation of what they are, but that doesn't mean the page should be deleted. Quite the opposite, actually. SilverserenC 09:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • When someone is referring to "behavior theory", which is quite common in psychology and sociology, they could be referring to any of the listed theories. This perfectly fits PTM because these theories ARE often just referred to as "behavior theory" when people are talking about them. SilverserenC 22:34, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]