Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behavior theory
- Behavior theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A very badly formed dab page with no acceptable entries. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Badly formatted? So fix it. No acceptable entries? And what kind of criteria is that? It's a helpful disambig page; this should be speedy closed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I see nothing wrong with this disambiguation page. It has a clear topic and three or more articles it links to, meeting the qualifications for such a page. Sure, each of the linked articles could use a single sentence addition giving a bit of explanation of what they are, but that doesn't mean the page should be deleted. Quite the opposite, actually. SilverserenC 09:49, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. You both need to read WP:PTM. At best, the entries have the words "behavior" and "theory" in their titles, at worst, they don't even do that. Perhaps it could be renamed List of behavior theories, but it is not a dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)