Talk:Delphi effect
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Duncharris (talk | contribs) at 10:53, 5 October 2004 (→[[Delphi effect]]: {{Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Harry Altman}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 10:53, 5 October 2004 by Duncharris (talk | contribs) (→[[Delphi effect]]: {{Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Harry Altman}})
Neologism. SWAdair | Talk 10:48, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was - merged
Unresolved. Previous discussion at Talk:Harry Altman. (4 votes to delete, 2 to keep) Dunc_Harris|☺ 10:52, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Well, I still feel that all his notability stems entirely from his appearance in one documentary, so I think the article should be a redirect. But on the plus side, it isn't written like a vanity article now. Average Earthman 12:01, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Spellbound (documentary), and de-linkify the links there to other competitors. Perhaps they should each have a sub-section in that article. —Rory ☺ 13:26, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. --Improv 17:05, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect - SimonP 20:00, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
- I voted keep last time and still do for the same reasons. After I thought it had survived VfD (because the debate was archived to the talk page) I started working on it. I'd like to work on the article, but I'm not going to put my time into something that will just be deleted: I have plenty else to do and no particular brief for this. -- Jmabel 00:44, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, certainly notable, and one of the more interesting personalities featured in spellbound which was a major documentary. —siroχo 04:42, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
- I loved the documentary, but I would favor merge and redirect to Spellbound (film). The point is that he's not notable outside of the context of the film yet. He may become so, but he did not parlay that exposure into commercials or political activism or inventing a new salad dressing. Therefore, he is sought and should be found within the context of the film. Geogre 21:00, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.