Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DPSingh

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Rajput case

Dmcdevit asked me to look into a pile of suspected sockpuppets related to the Rajput dispute, specifically Comte De Boigne, Saubhag Singh, Hukum singh, Dhruv Singh, Dhruv singh, Raj tilak, Banke.

DPSingh socks: Shomu, Hukum singh, Addul, Jamwal, Kalhana, Inayat Bhati, Jmawal, Inder Singh, Anveshan, IP 202.138.112.252. All blocked.
Dhruv Singh, Dhruv singh, Raj tilak and Banke appear to be single-purpose accounts created for this dispute. All blocked.
Saubhag Singh: apparent role account, created only for this style of edit. Could be a cohort or using a compromised machine.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by David Gerard (talk • contribs) [1]

Clerk note: See also Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rajput#DPSingh banned. Thatcher131 15:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

10 000 thundering typhoons (talk · contribs)

Possibly one of the editors banned in Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rajput. dab (ᛏ) 09:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nobody reacted to this. there is good circumstantial evidence that this is a sock of a banned user. Can we get a usercheck please? dab (ᛏ) 12:19, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible to be sure. There are numerous sockpuppet-looking accounts created from that /24 recently, though, but I can't be absolutely sure they aren't legit users yet. Note that there are both:

10 000 thundering typhoons (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
10,000 thundering typhoons (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Note that a checkuser is not required to block someone who appears to be a disruptive sock. If they behave the same they can generally be considered the same. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 18:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. It is impossible to be sure, since this is a case of a nationalist tag team, and a group of several users was banned, it is impossible to say which of these users this might be, or whether this is just another kid with the same mindset (nationalism tending to quench individual traits in people). I think we'll just have to consider him a "good faith edit warrior" for now. dab (ᛏ) 08:19, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.