Talk:Ironic process theory

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ironic process theory article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggest the 2010 film "Inception" as another example.

"I say to you, 'Don't think about elephants.' What do you think about?"

"...Elephants."

129.138.30.223 (talk) 00:30, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never thought Wikipedia would make me lose The Game. 68.40.58.27 (talk) 01:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dohohohohohoho ~九尾の氷狐~ ^{(「Sumimasen!」「Dochira samaka?」)} 10:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny - it makes me lose all the time. The concept "people bickering about whether a wikipedia article should be deleted or not" reminds me of the ur-example: has any article ever had its status changed more than the article about the game? --Adam Field (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

The whole article is confusing. The first paragraph makes no sense - perhaps a diagram can help? The first sentence in the second paragraph references "this"??? RainBoxRed (talk) 14:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remove The Game

I'm proposing to remove the photo reference to "The Game." 'The Game' is a separate topic from the psychological phenomenon of "ironic process theory". Including as a primary photo reference, a picture depicting The Game in this particular article is not relevant, nor apropos. (As an illustration, you wouldn't expect to see a photo of the game "Monopoly" in an article on "real estate"; the two are separate topics). I am fine with including a reference to 'The Game' as already included in this article. So, if no one disputes this proposal, I'll remove the photo. Thank you.Ronsword (talk) 19:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]