Talk:Gaussian process emulator

Statistics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Wonder if this will survive? I don't know anything about it just had it mentioned as an alternate technique to a neural net and random forests. crandles (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect elsewhere?

Perhaps this should just be redirected elsewhere perhaps to Bayes estimator?

Maybe the following could help: "the Bayesian emulator ideas introduced by Kennedy and O'Hagan, now being developed in the climate context by Jonty Rougier and people at the Hadley Centre. I think this is probably what "Gaussian process emulators" refers to in your paragraph."

I have provided a link in the article to Anthony O'Hagan, Marc C. Kennedy and Jeremy E. Oakley paper.

crandles (talk) 11:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded this somewhat, at least providing a better meaning and context. However, it is not obvious how much about applications should be put here rather than in a more general article about statistical analysis of computer experiments. I don't think that just adding to computer experiment would be suitable. There seems enough special context here to make it good to have this separate from Bayes estimator. Melcombe (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]