Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smart Energy System
- Smart Energy System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable system written as a position paper or advertisement. The only apparent reference is their own--the term, of course, is so general as to be unsearchable. DGG ( talk ) 02:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be a promotional article written about a concept. EoRdE6 (talk) 02:48, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as spam. (full disclosure: I closed the deletion review) -- RoySmith (talk) 03:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- G11 without further delay please.—S Marshall T/C 12:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Smart grid--Pontificalibus (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not strongly opposed to the redirect, but neither do I think it's needed. This seems an unlikely search term, which is the purpose of redirects. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Is there any reason why you think it is an unlikely search term? The phrase appears to be in widespread use e.g. 1.--Pontificalibus (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my semi-objection to the redirect. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- Is there any reason why you think it is an unlikely search term? The phrase appears to be in widespread use e.g. 1.--Pontificalibus (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not strongly opposed to the redirect, but neither do I think it's needed. This seems an unlikely search term, which is the purpose of redirects. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)