Talk:Banker's algorithm

See also is for irrelevant resources (?) OK, can be. But for relevant as well? (Primarily for relevant) --Premil 14:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. I missed an extra 'also' in my edit comment. Mark Hurd 15:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Banker's rounding link

What does the Banker's rounding link have to do with deadlock avoidance?

This article plagurised?

This entire article looks suspiciously similar to the explaination of Banker's algorithm in "Operating System Concepts" by Silberschatz, Galvin, and Gagne (pages 259-261 of the 7th edition). Everything from the structure of the article to most of the wording, with a few changes, is no different from this copyrighted work. I'm assuming this shouldn't be?

Indeed it should not. I have now rewritten the article from scratch as a stub article using multiple sources, and added a reference to the source you cite above for further reading. -- The Anome 12:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Added algorithm section

I added a large section describing how the algorithm works. I wrote this from my memory of the algorithm from my operating systems class. I did check with some websites and my textbook (which I cited) to make sure I wasn't too far off. Still, it would help if someone else could double check everything, (especially to make sure it is clear enough and not too technical). Also, I didn't want to remove the stub tag myself, but there might be enough information now to do so. MagiMaster 07:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]