Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented SQL
Appearance
- Object-oriented SQL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources since 2009. The article consists of two sentences and I am actually not sure what they are about. I suggest it be WP:TNT'd. — Keφr 14:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Could the nominator actually explain what is wrong with the many sources in GBooks which refer to ""Object-oriented SQL" and "OSQL"? Could the nominator also explain why this can't be redirected to SQL? James500 (talk) 15:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- The fact that this article uses none of them. There is no useful content in this article, it borders on
{{db-nocontext}}
. Having it as a WP:REDLINK for a while would encourage creation of a better-written article.
- Also, where is it established that "Object-oriented SQL" is the same as "OSQL"? Databases do not seem to be your area of expertise. — Keφr 16:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- The fact that this article uses none of them. There is no useful content in this article, it borders on