Jump to content

Talk:IBM Parallel Sysplex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Christian75 (talk | contribs) at 10:38, 19 August 2014 (Assessment: +Computing (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Why does it require z/OS R.8 for an ICF-only implementation to be viable? With CF Duplexing many installations I know run without external CFs. Martin Packer 20:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuilding CF structures

There were some improvements introduced in z/OS 1.8 for more efficient CF duplexing and rebuilding CF structures. That statement in the article makes sense to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BBCWatcher (talk • contribs) 14:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I think the two articles can be combined into a more fleshed out single article. In my view, GDPS is a subset of Parallel Sysplex and therefore describing the two can be done in a single article. Both articles are fairly stubby. In looking at IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel Sysplex to try and clean it up I thought it may be better to combine them. Any thoughts from others? --TreyGeek (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the IBM Sysplex article. Any thoughts on merging all three together? --TreyGeek (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have written up a combined version of the three articles (IBM Sysplex, IBM Parallel Sysplex, and IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel Sysplex). It can be viewed in my sandbox: User:TreyGeek/sandbox. I would appreciate any comments or suggestions. If there are no arguments against the proposed merge, I will perform it next weekend (April 25/26). --TreyGeek (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:IBM_Parallel_Sysplex&oldid=621898689"