Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Key-objects
- Key-objects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 08:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- You couldn't possibly establish something that doesn't exist, like in this case. Delete. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 08:56, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds legit, merge with Structured Search (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)... if that is even notable itself. Both articles, started by the same editor, seems to be purely promotional of this patented programming paradigm. Could even probably bundle delete. (t/c) 11:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete—article is here to prop up Structured Search, which isn't notable either. Both terms are sufficiently generic that I would expect to find them used across dozens of different computing disciplines, but there's no particular use that has garnered sufficient coverage in WP:RS to justify an article. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC)