Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object-oriented design ontology

Object-oriented design ontology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is pure Original Research. There are no references to the actual topic. There are references to the concept of ontology and references to the fact that object-oriented methods clearly fall into subpart and sublcass hierarchies (as does just about any form of knowledge) but no references (and to my knowledge no such references currently exists, hence OR) to the actual topic. Also, as I documented on Talk page, if we keep this article why shouldn't we have a topic on EVERY possible topic that could be represented via an ontology, which would mean thousands of new topics since just about any form of structured information can be represented by an ontology. MadScientistX11 (talk) 17:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Concur with nom. Object-oriented design is ontologizable, but the ontolization itself has not been treated as a subject in WP:RS. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 18:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]