Talk:VEGAS algorithm

Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Untitled

This document seems to sourced in part from the documentation for the GNU Scientific Libraries. Doesn't this page need to have the license statement on it?

Depends on if it is verbatim copied or just used as a source, and also the GNU Scientific libraries docs are GFDL right? - Taxman ^Talk 13:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I also disagree with a merge into Monte Carlo as this is a detailed subtopic, and the main monte carlo article does not have room for this level of detail on every subtopic. - Taxman ^Talk 13:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with merge: the VEGAS algorithm is a particular algorithm that deserves its own article and can be discussed in detail, whereas Monte Carlo integration is a very general and broad topic. Althoug the Monte Carlo integration article currently has a detailed info on VEGAS, I rather think it should be detached and brought into this article. -- Ekjon Lok 23:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]