Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Systems Biology and Learning Machine

Systems Biology and Learning Machine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an academic paper, not an encyclopaedia article. It appears to be based on a master's thesis (see redirect to this page). Peridon (talk) 21:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : the article appears to be a research thesis. It seems the user is here specifically to promote the author of the thesis and the thesis itself (Wikicology (talk) 22:07, 19 July 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be almost completely WP:OR. The fractured English doesn't help. Msnicki (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Agree that this is WP:OR. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
--Jorge Guerra Pires (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC) Dear all, this is the author of the page. My intention was the best, I did not want to promote my work, besides I have been working with that. Don't you think that someone that spent time with something can talk about it? anyway, if you all decide to delete, it does not matter to me. I was just trying to contribute, that is all. Best Regards.[reply]

--Jorge Guerra Pires (talk) 05:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC) Dear all, as some of you have commented, my page is OR, from the page of Wikipedia "...To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented..." did you all really read the article? there are several references in the end for supporting the idea. There are more, but I need time to edit or other users could complemente.[reply]
Dear Jorge Guerra Pires, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I think the subject of the Wikipedia article that you wrote is acceptable, but you would have a much stronger case for keeping this article if you put footnotes next to each significant claim that you make. I suggest that you make a copy of this article in your user sandbox here and work on it in the sandbox. When you have finished you can submit the draft for review through the Wikipedia:Articles for Creation process. If the article passes AFC review then it is likely to remain a part of Wikipedia. Thank you, --Pine^✉ 07:43, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]