Jump to content

Talk:Specification and Description Language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Christian75 (talk | contribs) at 21:03, 6 July 2014 (Assessment: +Computing (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have swapped the content of "Specification and Description Language" and "Specifciation and Design Language" MJ 19. 12. 2006 "Specifciation and Design Language" now redirects to "Specification and Description Language".

I think SDL refered at beginning to the term "Specifciation and Design Language", if this is the case, please make a note on the "Specification and Description Language" page. If that was not the case, the page "Specifciation and Design Language" should be removed.

SDL subpages

An unfortunite, yet never recognised, misusage of the Process agent reference was used by Hrudaya when adding the hierarchical references to this page. Changing it the way I did -I hope- will help to improve the content o WikiPedia... JanEnEm (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Some questions about SDL" blog note

I have written a blog note with title as above (http://www.teigfam.net/oyvind/home/technology/056-some-questions-about-sdl/) and wonder if it would be appropriate to include it in the "External links" section? It contains comments by one of the original SDL specialists. If it is not appropriate, then I (or you) should also remove this chapter, to avoid piggy-backing on Wikipedia. Øyvind Teig (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]