Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Network Projects

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to establish notability of this charity. The only reference is to their charity registration, which is WP:ROUTINE coverage. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Sources now added to the article to establish notability these include National Health Services (NHS), The Express newspaper and the Phone Co-Op part of the Co-operative Group. The charity was established with a name back in 1990 which has become words in increasingly common and in popular use. This is one of the reasons I believe they need an identify and presence on Wikipedia. I can add further relevant content and improve in time, but request this is not deleted for the above reasons. Craig Barnshaw (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: probably a bit premature. This article was created by a first-time editor at the Barclays Editathon, who is just getting to grips with what we require for notability. There is now a reference to a Sunday Express article where the CE of Community Network comments on social isolation and the article name-checks the Community Network website and phone contact at the end. Community Network gets a brief paragraph in the NHS "Loneliness in older people" article. There's also an article in charitydigitalnews.co.uk about Community Network's tie-in with The Phone Co-op. It's possibly still short of the significant coverage we ask for, but it's looking like waiting a day for the original author to add the extra references has improved the article substantially. --RexxS (talk) 19:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]