This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HgandVenus(talk | contribs) at 05:05, 30 May 2014(I'll nominate it using page curation , twinkle seems to have some bugs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 05:05, 30 May 2014 by HgandVenus(talk | contribs)(I'll nominate it using page curation , twinkle seems to have some bugs)
Assume A, B, C, D are known matrices; x and y are unknown vectors; f is known vector; g is unknown vector. We are interested to know the vector x. What is the best solution? Shuang-ren Zhao defined a Local inverse[1] to solve the above problem. First we consider the simplest solution.
or
or
On the above solution the result x is related to the unknown vector y. Since y can be any values, this way the result x has very strong artifacts which is .
In order to minimize the above artifacts of the solution, we considered a special matrix which satisfy
or
Here is generalized inverse of the matrix .
x can be solved from the above formula. It is easy to see that Q can be written as following:
Here is the generalized inverse of B which satisfy
hence
It is easy to prove that
and hence
Hence Q is also the generalized inverse of Q
That means
or
The matrix
is defined as the local inverse of Matrix A. Using local inverse instead of generalized inverse or inverse can avoid the artifacts from unknown input data.
References
^Shuangren Zhao, Kang Yang, Dazong Jiang, Xintie Yang, Interior reconstruction using local inverse, J Xray Sci Technol. 2011; 19(1): 69-90