Talk:Exploratory data analysis

Statistics Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

The last edit did not promote any specific tool. It merely had the purpose of separating the links to tools which have other Wikipedia articles devoted to them and links to external websites. No Wikipedia site should be misused as a link-farm and links to external websites must only occur within an "External links" section.

And would you be the same "gragus" listed as the project administrator on the LiveGraph SourceForge page, and creator of the Wikipedia article for LiveGraph? Looking at Wikipedia policies (item 3), perhaps it would be best just to remove all references to software from this article. They do not serve to define what EDA is. Or perhaps if someone were to create a website comparing EDA software, that would be an appropriate external link. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.240.4.166 (talk) 18:44, August 23, 2007 (UTC)

Exploratory data analysis and descriptive statistics

Isn't exploratory data analysis just an extension of descriptive statistics? In other words, shouldn't descriptive statistics and exploratory data analysis be merged? Or at least mention the relationship between the two in the both articles? 08:40, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Marcocapelle (talk) 20:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]