Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Based Program Design
- Community Based Program Design (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability concerns. Launchballer 09:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Launchballer, can you be more specific? Notability concerns is rather vague. Umich hudsonmh (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- I don't believe it meets WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.--Launchballer 15:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- This article is consistent with WP:GNG and WP:NCORP guidelines because the article relies on significant coverage of credible, independent and third party sources for support. Umich hudsonmh (talk) 16:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Launchballer, thank you. I'd've thought there wasn't enough there to pass. That said, I spotted {{ course assignment | course = Education Program:University of Michigan/Social Work Practice with Community and Social Systems (Winter 2014) | term = 2013 Q3 }} when I was removing some whitespace - what is that supposed to mean?--Launchballer 16:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- This article is consistent with WP:GNG and WP:NCORP guidelines because the article relies on significant coverage of credible, independent and third party sources for support. Umich hudsonmh (talk) 16:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- I don't believe it meets WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.--Launchballer 15:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Launchballer, can you be more specific? Notability concerns is rather vague. Umich hudsonmh (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- KEEP - Thee template says " course assignment | course = Education Program:University of Michigan/Social Work Practice with Community and Social Systems (Winter 2014) | term = 2013 Q3" And Whether you agree with notability or not, this is a course assignment from the University of Michigan. It should not be deleted. — Maile (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- I was wondering what that was. I assumed that because of the |term=2013 Q3, it was part of an assignment from last year that hadn't been improved very well. I'm happy to withdraw.--Launchballer 07:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Launchballer, if you're withdrawing can you make it more clear by bolding the word or, preferably, putting a short note below your nom? I was looking over the entry and I wasn't sure what you meant. czar ♔ 05:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- I cannot see how I could have been any less ambiguous than 'I am happy to withdraw', but as you wish, I have bolded it.--Launchballer 07:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Launchballer, if you're withdrawing can you make it more clear by bolding the word or, preferably, putting a short note below your nom? I was looking over the entry and I wasn't sure what you meant. czar ♔ 05:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- I was wondering what that was. I assumed that because of the |term=2013 Q3, it was part of an assignment from last year that hadn't been improved very well. I'm happy to withdraw.--Launchballer 07:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)