Rod and frame test
It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it. This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice. Find sources: "Rod and frame test" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR Nominator: Please consider notifying the author/project: {{subst:proposed deletion notify|Rod and frame test|concern=Unwikified [[WP:NOT PAPERS|research paper]]}} ~~~~Timestamp: 20140508194521 19:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Administrators: delete |
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Rod and Frame Illusion
The rod and frame illusion occurs because of the effect of the orientation of the frame on the rod. In the simplest example of the rod and frame illusion, the illusion will cause the participant to perceive the rod to be oriented congruent with the orientation of the frame (Corbett and Ennis, 2006). When the participant is viewing the rod and frame that are both positioned at 0 degrees (or vertical), he or she perceives the rod as vertical with perfect accuracy. However, when the frame is tilted away from vertical the participant’s perception of vertical is affected. The participant tends to perceive the rod to be tilted in the same direction as the frame is oriented (e.g. if the frame is tilted in the counterclockwise direction the rod will also be perceived as being tilted counterclockwise). As the tilt of the frame increases, the participants’ perceived vertical increasingly deviates from true vertical.
Rod and Frame Test
To perform the rod and frame task, an apparatus consisting of a rod in a square frame is provided. An example commercial apparatus can be seen in Picture 1. When the participant is being tested using the apparatus, his/her head is set firmly in the chin rest, which can be seen in Picture 2. The rod and frame are shown in the center of the far end of the apparatus (as seen in Picture 3), which provides a frame of reference to the participant. Both the participant and the experimenter are able to adjust the orientation of the rod, while only the experimenter can adjust the frame orientation by using the appropriate knobs on the apparatus, as seen in Picture 1. The experimenter is able to see the exact degree measurement of the rod and frame from vertical (as shown in Picture 4), while the participant sees the physical rod and frame inside the apparatus. The methods of constant stimuli, limits, and adjustment can be used to test the participants, but method of limits is most commonly used in research conducted using the rod and frame task (e.g. Wenderoth, 1977). When using the method of limits the experimenter sets the orientation of the rod and frame separately and then the participant is asked to adjust the rod orientation until they perceive it to be vertical. Deviation from true vertical can then be determined. Based on which way the frame is tilted, the rod can be viewed as either being tilted in the same direction as the frame (direct effect), or in the opposite direction of the frame (indirect effect).
Evidence
The frame of reference with respect to studies of the visual system refers to perceived reference axes. In the rod and frame illusion there are a number of things that can influence one’s frame of reference. Spinelli, Antonicci, Daini, and Zoccolotti (1995) state that one reason people experience the rod and frame illusion is due to visual-vestibular interactions. For instance, when a participant is viewing the rod and frame task while physically tilted, the participant acts as though they are tilted opposite of the orientation of the frame. This suggests that the illusion, in part, is due to the person compensating for their perceived vertical in the direction that is opposite of the frame. Other evidence proposed by researchers that is consistent with this is that when participants are put on their sides to view the rod and frame task, they rely on their vision when their vestibular and proprioceptive senses are incongruent with those of their visual senses (Corbett and Enns, 2006). These finding suggest that the rod and frame illusion is processed in a type of hierarchy, where visual input is at the top, then vestibular cues, and finally proprioceptive cues. Lipshits’ (2010) found that along with this hierarchy of processing, that proprioceptive information, as opposed to gravity, is used by the body to determine which way is vertical. The researcher mentions that when we are not able to use vision to determine which way is vertical, people use other cues based on the axis of their head and body.
 | This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (May 2014) |