Talk:Parent pointer tree
![]() | Computer science Unassessed | ||||||||||||||||
|
Use of saguaro stack for multitasking
The first documented use of a saguaro stack that I'm aware of was on the Burroughs B6500[1][2], where the stacks for various tasks in a program formed a tree structure, with links to stack frames on the parent stacks for nested blocks.
References
- ^ Organick, Elliot I. (1973). Computer System Organization The B5700/B6700 series (despite the title, the book does not cover the B5x00.) (PDF). Academic Press.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|separator=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - ^ Burroughs (September 1969). Burroughs B6500 Information Processing System Reference Manual (PDF). 1043676.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|separator=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
What model does Smalltalk use?
We have an inconsistency I think. This page says:
Examples of languages that use spaghetti stacks are:
- ...
- Languages where the execution stack can be inspected and modified at runtime such as Smalltalk
...and on the other hand, Closure (computer science) says:
Since that call has already returned and the Smalltalk method invocation model does not follow the spaghetti stack discipline to allow multiple returns, this operation results in an error.
I don't know enough about Smalltalk to tell which one is right. --Doradus (talk) 12:34, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguating reference — but the text does not match
I've tried to "disambiguate" a citation to a volume of conference proceedings by guessing which paper might have been meant. The current citation, in essence, cannot be verified. The citation was introduced here, and my change is here. Subsequently, I moved the citation to another sentence. In fact, the paper does describe "kind-of" the same data structure, but with quite a few subtle variations (in fact, what the next paragraph describes is closer to Sec. 4.1, the "garbage-collection" strategy, rather than a spaghetti stack; spaghetti stacks are described by the cited paper[1] as using their own implementation of garbage collection.
However, I don't have time to rewrite this page based on the cited article, and it's just one article — but I don't have time to survey articles on the topic.
--Blaisorblade (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi: 10.1145/62678.62692 , please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi= 10.1145/62678.62692
instead.