Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zephram Stark

If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zephram Stark}}
The previous request (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Pandora Rodriguez (talk · contribs)

Pandora Rodriguez (talk · contribs) as a possible sockpuppet of banned User:Zephram Stark/User:Peter McConaughey/User:Jamal al din/User:Fred Veraxamin. "Her" behavior closely fits Zephram's, especially the obsession with me [1] despite no direct contact. Also seems unusually critical of other admins for a brand new user with about 15 edits. Carbonite | Talk 22:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no doubt that this is a sockpuppet account, and I am doubly concerned that the image on said person's userpage may be a copyvio of some sort. Hall Monitor 22:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't see a need for a checkuser. The user is quite plainly a sockpuppet. Just indefinitely block. Actually, I am feeling chirpy. I'll do it myself. [[Sam Korn]] 22:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - I think a checkuser here would still be interesting - user seems just as likely to be Mistress Selina Kyle, who also came out of nowhere and jumped immediately and exclusively to community actions. Might be well worth untangling. Phil Sandifer 22:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - I think it's generally believed that MSK is a reincarnation of Chaosfeary. Nevertheless, Pandora Rodriguez needed to be blocked, whoever (s)he really is. [[Sam Korn]] 22:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      - I agree, a CheckUser couldn't hurt, but I'd wager good money that this a sockpuppet of Zephram. Carbonite | Talk 22:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        Checkuser result is a high-probable positive, but not 100% conclusive. Kelly Martin (talk) 22:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Rudolf_Nixon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

User created today and voted in two important polls. Actual votes make me wonder if this is a sockpuppet of someone. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 23:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See above. This is quite likely a sockpuppet of banned user Zephram Stark (talk · contribs). Carbonite | Talk 02:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree. Similar anti-Carbonite, anti-Radiant! comments. Similar user page to other ZS socks. Similar viewpoints on WP heirarchy. I'd say this is definitely a valid case for CheckUser. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 14:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See comments on Zephram Stark, above. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Peace Inside (talk · contribs)

Almost certainly a sockpuppet of banned Zephram Stark (talk · contribs). See the previous sockpuppets here. Peace Inside registered less than a day after the previous incarnation (User:Pandora Rodriguez) was blocked and has all of Zephram's calling cards (accusation of admin abuse, despotism, long diatribes). Also, made a joke [2] about recognizing User:MONGO, who Zephram interacted with as another of his scokpuppets, User:Peter McConaughey. Carbonite | Talk 22:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: May have already moved on to Rudolf Nixon (talk · contribs). Only a few comments so far, but these [3] [4] [5] look more like out friend Zeph than a brand-new user. Carbonite | Talk 23:42, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A friend alerted me that you are calling me a sockpuppet. Can I ask why you have initiated this attack on me? What have I ever done to you? What rules have I broken? How can I prove my innocence? *Peace Inside 02:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Inside is the same editor as Jamal al Din, Peter McConaughey, and KIMP (talk · contribs), which appears to be latest incarnation. Rudolph Nixon is a probable, especially given past use of another account, Random Element (talk · contribs), which looks to me to be a likely Zephram sock. Both accounts are on the same ISP in the same geographic area. I'd prefer Jayjg look at this one in more detail as he is more familiar with Zephram's MO. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Nixon (talk · contribs) was another Zephram Stark sockpuppet. Fred Veraxamin (talk · contribs) and Doctor Nicetan (talk · contribs) were also sockpuppets. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:11, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.

If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zephram Stark}}
The previous request (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

A bird in the hand (talk · contribs)

Pretty obvious sockpuppet of banned user Zephram Stark, based on edit history. Some of his past sockpuppets were: JW1805 (Talk) 21:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See Category:Wikipedia:Suspected_sockpuppets_of_Zephram_Stark for near-complete list. --JW1805 (Talk) 21:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.