Talk:Free electron model
![]() | Physics Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
is this article equivalent or related to [[1]] ? - Schroedi 16:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Model shortcomings
As the free electron model is surprisingly successful in explaining many experimental phenomena, are there any model shortcomings that explain phenomena in a wrong way? --Abdull 09:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Sommerfeld theory of metals
This free electron model often known as the Sommerfeld theory of metals. Rod57 (talk) 00:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Not only solid-state physics
This article starts with "In solid-state physics, the free electron model .." implying that the term is only used in solid-state physics. This ignores the method with the same name introduced by J. R. PLatt in the late 1940s and 1950s where the pi system of conjugated hydrocarbons are treated just like the "particle in a box" method. It was also applied to conjugated cyclic systems such as benzene. How best can this be introduced into the article? --Bduke (Discussion) 06:37, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Figure Caption
"Traveling plane waves restlessly heading for their Final Destination"
Eh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.12.16.145 (talk) 10:41, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
free electron "immune" to gravity?
The most recent issue of the CERN Courier makes an oblique reference to a free electron exhibiting a gravitational acceleration constant of 0, instead of 9.8 m/s^2. Has this phenomena ever been studied in any more detail? Is there a better reference? It might be worth adding to the page if it can be substantiated. Here's the text: "Measurements based on dropping electrons led to a value of the acceleration of gravity, g, consistent with zero"