Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LoadingReadyRun
Appearance
Nonnotable website. Alexa rank 2,643,824[1]. Differently named article on site was twice speedied. This version was sufficiently different that it was decided to give them a week or so to show notability. It's been a week and a half, and there's been no activity on the page for three days. Drat (Talk) 08:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable. --InShaneee 16:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 23:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 03:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Don't Delete Article is not a stub, most items requiring citation have been cited. There seems to be a reasonable number of people interested in the subject matter to make it notable, Google search shows around 9000 search results[2], subject matter is well known within a community[3] -- Basscomm 19:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC), content has won an independant award [4] Basscomm 19:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- comment Well of course it is well known within the community of its own official forums. Also, if you filter out hits from the official site, you only get 3750 hits. Note also that all of Basscomm's 8 current edits concern the article and this nomination.--Drat (Talk) 09:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Alexa rank criteria is flimsy. Mr. Lawrence has an Alexa rank of 5,462,316 [5]. -- Basscomm 05:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - that article doesn't show any reason why that person is notable. The same goes for the other blogger articles created by the author, Mr. Babylon and Ms. Frizzle (American blogger). All three seem prod-worthy as unremarkable.--Drat (Talk) 05:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Don't Delete On the edge though --Korandder 02:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- comment. To quote Stifle from another afd some months ago, "Isn't it funny how 'Do not delete' and 'Don't delete' only show up on this kind of article?".--Drat (Talk)