Talk:Free Expression Policy Project

Print encyclopedias

Per WP:DEADTREE Standard, mentioning here that this organization is discussed in mutliple print encyclopedias, including:

• Finan, Christopher M. (2010). "Free Expression Policy Project [FEPP]". In Jackson, Kenneth T.; Keller, Lisa; Flood, Nancy (eds.). The Encyclopedia of New York City (2nd ed.). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300114652. OCLC 842264684.
• Lester, Ray; Clinch, Peter; Dawson, Heather; Edwards, Helen; Tarrant, Susan, eds. (2008). "The Free Expression Policy Project: a think tank on artistic and intellectual freedom". The New Walford Guide to Reference Resources. Facet Publishing. p. 550-552. ISBN 978-1856044981. The site is notable for its extensive and well annotated list of links to websites which also have information about censorship, free expression ...

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 04:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

From redirect to article creation

This article previously only existed as a redirect.

I've since done a great deal of research and expanded it into an article using twenty-two (22) sources.

So far in the course of my research I've been able to expand the page using only secondary sources.

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 04:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Notices posted

Posted notices of new article creation, to the following talk pages:

1. User talk:Cirt
2. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Public Policy
3. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States
4. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology
5. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology
6. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
7. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Media
8. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mass surveillance
9. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law
10. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Journalism
11. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech
12. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human rights
13. User talk:WurmWoode

— Cirt (talk) 04:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Submitted to Guild of Copy Editors

I've submitted this article for copy edit through the Guild of Copy Editors process.

— Cirt (talk) 04:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Nominated for GA

I've nominated this article for review at WP:GAN as a candidate for Good Article quality.

Cheers,

— Cirt (talk) 04:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Free Expression Policy Project/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 21:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: — Cirt (talk)

Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 21:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh, wow, that was quick! Thank you, Seabuckthorn, for reviewing this article related to my quality improvement project of improving articles on Wikipedia on topics of freedom of speech and censorship, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

• a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
• b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

WP:LEAD:

Check for WP:LEAD: Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:  Done Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):  Done Check for Introductory text:  Done Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO):  Done Major Point 1: History "Civil liberties lawyer Marjorie Heins founded the nonprofit organization in 2000. Based in Manhattan, New York, it was initially associated with the National Coalition Against Censorship, and subsequently operated as part of the Democracy Program of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School." & "The FEPP conducted a survey in 2001 which revealed that online monitoring software including Net Nanny, SurfWatch and Cybersitter cast too broad a net and often blocked legitimate educational websites in their attempts to censor material from youths. In 2003, the organization assisted 33 academics in filing a friend-of-the-court brief in a challenge to a law which restricted the sale of violent video games to minors. In coordination with the Brennan Center for Justice of New York University Law School, the FEPP released a public policy report in 2006 on the inefficiency of Internet filtering; the report concluded freedom of expression was harmed by such online censorship activity. In 2007 the FEPP became independent of its prior supportive organizations the National Coalition Against Censorship and New York University Law School." (summarised well in the lead) Major Point 2: Analysis "The New Walford Guide to Reference Resources praised the FEPP website for its links to resources on freedom of expression and censorship. FEPP has been characterized by the Austin American-Statesman as a think tank devoted to researching the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Denver Post described the organization as a censorship watchdog organization, and a separate article from the same newspaper called it a left-of-center politically-aligned group which advocated for both intellectual freedom and artistic freedom." (summarised well in the lead) Check for Relative emphasis:  Done Major Point 1: History "Civil liberties lawyer Marjorie Heins founded the nonprofit organization in 2000. Based in Manhattan, New York, it was initially associated with the National Coalition Against Censorship, and subsequently operated as part of the Democracy Program of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School." & "The FEPP conducted a survey in 2001 which revealed that online monitoring software including Net Nanny, SurfWatch and Cybersitter cast too broad a net and often blocked legitimate educational websites in their attempts to censor material from youths. In 2003, the organization assisted 33 academics in filing a friend-of-the-court brief in a challenge to a law which restricted the sale of violent video games to minors. In coordination with the Brennan Center for Justice of New York University Law School, the FEPP released a public policy report in 2006 on the inefficiency of Internet filtering; the report concluded freedom of expression was harmed by such online censorship activity. In 2007 the FEPP became independent of its prior supportive organizations the National Coalition Against Censorship and New York University Law School." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body) Major Point 2: Analysis "The New Walford Guide to Reference Resources praised the FEPP website for its links to resources on freedom of expression and censorship. FEPP has been characterized by the Austin American-Statesman as a think tank devoted to researching the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Denver Post described the organization as a censorship watchdog organization, and a separate article from the same newspaper called it a left-of-center politically-aligned group which advocated for both intellectual freedom and artistic freedom." (the lead gives due weight as is given in the body) Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN):  Done Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE):  Done Free Expression Policy Project (FEPP) is an organization devoted to assisting researchers with assembling information related to freedom of speech, media democracy, and copyright, and advocating for these issues. Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE):  Done Check for Proper names and titles:  Done Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None Check for Pronunciation: None Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK):  Done Check for Biographies: NA Check for Organisms: NA Check for Biographies of living persons: NA Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):  Done Check for Non-English titles: Check for Usage in first sentence: Check for Separate section usage: Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):  Done Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER): None

WP:LAYOUT:

Done Check for WP:LAYOUT:  Done Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.  Done Check for Headings and sections:  Done Check for Section templates and summary style:  Done Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS):  Done Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):  Done Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER):  Done Check for Works or publications:  Done Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO): None Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR):  Done Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER): None Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL): None Check for Links to sister projects: None Check for Navigation templates:  Done Check for Formatting:  Done Check for Images (WP:LAYIM):  Done Check for Links:  Done Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE):  Done

WP:WTW:

Done Check for WP:WTW:  Done Check for Words that may introduce bias:  Done Check for Puffery (WP:PEA):  Done Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL):  Done Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL):  Done Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED):  Done Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED):  Done Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY):  Done Check for Expressions that lack precision:  Done Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM):  Done Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM):  Done Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME):  Done Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):  Done Check for WP:MOSFICT:  Done Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):  Done Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI):  Done Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT):  Done

WP:EMBED:
None Prose is preferred over list (WP:PROSE): Check for Tables (MOS:TABLES):

2: Verifiable with no original research

• a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
• b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

WP:RS:

Done Check for WP:RS:  Done Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING): (contentious)  Done Is it contentious?: Yes Does the ref indeed support the material?: Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):  Done Who is the author?: Gaetano, Chris (United Press International) (InfoTrac) (The Palm Beach Post) Hafner, Katie (The New York Times) Carroll, Brian (Routledge) Finan, Christopher M. (Yale University Press) Eakin, Emily (The New York Times) Ho, David (The Austin American-Statesman) (The Atlanta Journal-Constitution) Rowan, David (The Times) Shinkle, Peter (St. Louis Post-Dispatch) Kloer, Phil (The Atlanta Journal-Constitution) Bourge, Christian (United Press International) Sherman, Mark (The Record) Jesdanun, Anick (The Cincinnati Post) (Wisconsin State Journal) Signorielli, Nancy (ABC-CLIO) Bainbridge, Jim (The Gazette) Lester, Ray (Facet Publishing) Lindell, Chuck (The Austin American-Statesman) Thomas, David (The Denver Post) Ostrow, Joanne (The Denver Post) Does the author have a Wikipedia article?: What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?: What else has the author published?: Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?: Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):  Done United Press International InfoTrac The Palm Beach Post The New York Times Routledge Yale University Press The New York Times The Austin American-Statesman The Atlanta Journal-Constitution The Times St. Louis Post-Dispatch The Atlanta Journal-Constitution United Press International The Record The Cincinnati Post Wisconsin State Journal ABC-CLIO The Gazette Facet Publishing The Austin American-Statesman The Denver Post The Denver Post Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):

WP:MINREF:
Done Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:  Done Check for Direct quotations:  Done Check for Likely to be challenged:  Done Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP): NA

• c. No original research:  Done

WP:NOR:
Done Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):  Done Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):  Done Check for original images (WP:OI):  Done

3: Broad in its coverage

a. Major aspects:

Done Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources: Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS: Check for Out of scope: Check for The range of material that belongs in the article: Check for All material that is notable is covered: Check for All material that is referenced is covered: Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered: Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge: Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):

b. Focused:
Done Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH): Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):

4: Neutral

WP:NPOV:

Done 4. Fair representation without bias:  Done Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):  Done Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):  Done Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):  Done Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):  Done Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):  Done Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):  Done Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):  Done Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):  Done Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI): None Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV): None

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images  Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic)

Images:

Done 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  Done Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):  Done Image 1 (Marjorie Heins.jpg): This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. This version permits free use, including commercial use. Check for copyright status:  Done Image 1 (Marjorie Heins.jpg): Free. Check for non-free content (WP:NFC): None Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR): NA 6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  Done Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):  Done Image 1 (Marjorie Heins.jpg): Relevant. Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE): None Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):  Done Caption: "Marjorie Heins at an event for the National Coalition Against Censorship in 2009" succinct and informative

As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular is meticulous and engrossing. Thank you very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.

Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 21:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Seabuckthorn, thanks for reviewing another of my quality improvement projects related to the subjects of freedom of speech and censorship, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)