User talk:Dotarray

Welcome!

Hello, Dotarray, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 15:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011 (http://spam.gamepron.com)

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.

Hello Dotarray. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

See WP:REFSPAM for why your edits are not acceptable. MER-C 08:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Player Attack.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mkdw ^talk 01:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Player Attack concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Player Attack, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Player Attack (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Player Attack.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Single-purpose spam account

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that her block be reviewed:

Dotarray (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Understood. I have made other edits to Wikipedia pages in the past that have not been related to Player Attack, however it seems they have been done while not logged in to this account. I do understand completely why you have taken the action you have, however I believe I can still contribute useful content to the site. In addition, I am reading the Conflict of Interest content - specifically the FAQ for organizations which I missed earlier - to make sure I am familiar with what's okay and what's not. Dotarray (talk) 22:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Understood. I have made other edits to Wikipedia pages in the past that have not been related to Player Attack, however it seems they have been done while not logged in to this account. I do understand completely why you have taken the action you have, however I believe I can still contribute useful content to the site. In addition, I am reading the Conflict of Interest content - specifically the [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|FAQ for organizations]] which I missed earlier - to make sure I am familiar with what's okay and what's not. [[User:Dotarray|Dotarray]] ([[User talk:Dotarray#top|talk]]) 22:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Understood. I have made other edits to Wikipedia pages in the past that have not been related to Player Attack, however it seems they have been done while not logged in to this account. I do understand completely why you have taken the action you have, however I believe I can still contribute useful content to the site. In addition, I am reading the Conflict of Interest content - specifically the [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|FAQ for organizations]] which I missed earlier - to make sure I am familiar with what's okay and what's not. [[User:Dotarray|Dotarray]] ([[User talk:Dotarray#top|talk]]) 22:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Understood. I have made other edits to Wikipedia pages in the past that have not been related to Player Attack, however it seems they have been done while not logged in to this account. I do understand completely why you have taken the action you have, however I believe I can still contribute useful content to the site. In addition, I am reading the Conflict of Interest content - specifically the [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|FAQ for organizations]] which I missed earlier - to make sure I am familiar with what's okay and what's not. [[User:Dotarray|Dotarray]] ([[User talk:Dotarray#top|talk]]) 22:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Question Are you saying that you will stop posting links/references to playerattack.com, gamepron.com, musicpron.com, and any other sites you are affiliated with? Note that I've removed all of the ref spam you've added over the years, and if I see another SPA appear and begin re-adding them, the sites will all be blacklisted. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I will stop posting links and references to Player Attack and any other sites that I may be affiliated with (MusicPron and GamePron no longer exist). I understand that if I do post links or references to these sites - including links posted via sock-puppets - they will be blacklisted (and, presumably, my editing privileges will be revoked). Dotarray (talk) 23:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...also, I will provide another Wikipedia editor with the relevant information to complete the Player Attack article for creation, so I am no longer associated with that page either. Dotarray (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]