Jump to content

Talk:In-system programming

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 209.221.240.193 (talk) at 17:10, 24 February 2014 (→Merge with In-circuit serial programming). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Microchip free publicity

Shouldn't references to Microchip products be avoided? This looks like free publicity.

Merge with In-circuit serial programming

In-circuit serial programming and In-system programming seems both talk of the same topic from a slightly different point of view. IMO the former should be merged in the more generic In-system programming which already has references to other ISP protocols (JTAG).

Or In-system programming should concentrate on the concept of ISP whereas In-circuit serial programming should focus only on the use of SPI to program in-site AVR micro-controllers?

Sylvain Leroux (talk) 13:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And, for what it's worth, it appears all three cited references are now dead (squatted on or empty):

  • NeatInfo.com
  • TurboCube.com
  • Astrohex.com

--Roens (talk) 06:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think so. ISP and ICSP may not be the same. I searched the Atmel.com, there are a lot of things about ICP and something about ICSP. I think they are too similar and we often make mistakes.

--JiangXueqian (talk) 14:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--[Monnie Holt, P.E.] 12:10 24 February 2014 (EST)

ICSP was trademarked by Micro C Technologies, but it was abandoned as a Trademark in 2002. IMO, ICSP is one particular method/protcol for ISP. However, from what I see in industry, the two terms are interchangeable. I do not think they should be merged due to the technicality I mentioned in my opinion statement.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:In-system_programming&oldid=596937301"