Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xanadu Range

Xanadu Range

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a hoax, I was not able to find any sources that support the existence of this mountain range. -- JamesMoose (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

delete as patent hoax; I too could find no mention of this range. Mangoe (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this page is to support the further discovery of the Purcell Mountains of South-Eastern British Columbia. This is a new classification for the area to distinguish the mountains around Kimberley. Note that no sources have been found by the Wiki staff, because it is a newly designated area. Please DO NOT delete this page for the reason of the further exploration and recreational promotion of this area. Thank You.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.66.12.225 (talk)

Designated by whom? Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day. Mangoe (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Place names in BC are designated by the BC Geographical Names commission. They have no entry for Xanadu: [1] The Interior (Talk) 17:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails verifiability in spectacular fashion. An assertion was made in the article after it was nominated for deletion indicating that the article is for "promotion of outdoor activity around the Kimberley area". -- Whpq (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]