Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biologically inspired algorithms

Biologically inspired algorithms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced list-like article about a rather haphazard collection of computer science techniques. Unless a reliable source can be found that establishes the notability of the category of "biologically inspired algorithms" per se, I don't see why this article should be kept. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bio-inspired computing which has similar lists, but has references (or at least further readings), too. While there are 1,220 hits for "biologically inspired algorithms" on GScholar and the topic is likely notable, the article as it stands adds nothing to what is already in Bio-inspired computing. Users will be best served by a redirect to that article. No prejudice against an enterprising editor who wishes to develop the redirect on this topic into a proper article. --Mark viking (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. As Mark viking already said, this is definitely a notable topic but there is nothing in the nominated article worth keeping. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (change of opinion). I should have done more searching before nominating. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bio-inspired computing per Mark viking. -- 101.119.28.55 (talk) 13:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]