Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If a desired move is uncontroversial and technical in nature (e.g. spelling and capitalization), or a revert of an undiscussed move where discussion is needed, please feel free to move the page yourself. If you cannot, request it below.

The Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle applies to uncontroversial moves (see Wikipedia:Be bold) and reverts of undiscussed moves. The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves.

If any of the following apply to the desired move, treat it as potentially controversial:

• There is an existing article (not just a redirect) at the target title
• There has been any past debate about the best title for the page
• Someone could reasonably disagree with the move.

If the page has recently been moved without discussion, you may revert the move and initiate a discussion on its talk page. If you are unable to revert, request it below.

To list new technical requests use the following code at the bottom of the sub-section "Technical requests" immediately below:

{{subst:RMassist|<!--old page name, without brackets-->|<!--requested name, without brackets-->|<!--reason for move-->}}

This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Do not edit the article's talk page.

If you object to a proposal listed in Technical requests, please move it to the Contested technical requests section below.

If your technical request is contested by another editor, remove the request from the "Contested technical requests" section and follow the instructions at Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Alternatively, if the only obstacle to a technical move is another page in the way (e.g., a redirect to the current title of the article to be moved, a redirect with no incoming links, or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history—if it has a single history line, see WP:MOR instead), add the following code to the top of the page that is in the way:

{{db-move|<!--page to be moved here-->|<!--reason for move-->}}

This will list the undesired page for deletion under criterion for speedy deletion G6. If the page is a redirect, place the code above the redirection. For a list of articles being considered for uncontroversial speedy deletion, see Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

• User:Captain Assassin!/sandbox1 → Tevar (film) (move) – I've created it in my sandbox and now I wan it at article space, thanks. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 03:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

• Elizabeth Freeman (slave) → Elizabeth Freeman (move) – No need to disambiguate, per talk page discussion. Jojalozzo 04:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Object to speedy this is why WP:RM exists. The disambiguation page should be restored. This is a multimove, and should have just been done through the regular process. If you had enough support, then you could just have asked for a WP:SNOW. But as it is, it is a replacement of one page by another, without informing that other page's watchers about the state of affairs. Quite frankly, 1 day of discussion isn't very much, considering may editors may be out until the weekend. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 07:11, 30 January 2014 (UTC)