Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biomass Research and Development Board
Appearance
- Biomass Research and Development Board (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have been unable to find any independent coverage in reliable sources. The board is occasionally mentioned in reports by other agencies (not independent) and in specialty blogs (not reliable). The article fails the general notability guideline and the notability guideline for organizations. No new content has appeared in the article since right after its creation in June 2008. That's not AfD evidence, but it does suggest that there's not something I've missed in my search for sources; there's just not much notable going on at this agency. Lagrange613 21:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Martin451 22:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Martin451 22:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2014 (UTC)