Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thurs statistical function
- Retain.I (DrDBKarron) have the attention of Prof Powell now and he now editing this=.
Dbkarron (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thurs statistical function (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article cites two articles with seven and eleven citations in GScholar, respectively, which is not enough to establish notability. Moreover, it does not have references for the bulk of its text, which is written in the first person plural, suggesting either plagiarism or original research. I tried a web search to find references, but I couldn't find any. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. per nominator. Also, article is atrociously written. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC).
- Retain I will be using it to process medical data in 2014 to investigate the points advanced by the Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC) initiative of the Department of Health and Human Services. Valerie J H Powell, co-editor of Powell, V et al., Integration of Medical and Dental Care and Patient Data (Springer UK, 2012: http://www.springer.com/public+health/book/978-1-4471-2184-8).Valerie541 (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- spurious reason with no basis in Wikipedia policy. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC).