Template talk:JavaScript

Move proposal on January 9, 2014

Template:JavaScript → Template:JavaScript navbox – To make room for a new Template:JavaScript that can be used as a wrapper for edit requests to .js pages with source highlighting and background coloring. Examples would look like:

{{JavaScript|remove|
   /* section */
   var section = true;
   if(!section){
      alert("LIES!");
   }
}}

resulting in:

   /* section */
   var section = true;
   if(!section){
      alert("LIES!");
   }

or

{{JavaScript|add|
   /* section */
   var section = true;
   if(section){
      alert("You've spoken the truth!");
   }
}}

resulting in:

   /* section */
   var section = true;
   if(section){
      alert("You've spoken the truth!");
   }

Thanks for your consideration Technical 13 (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC) Technical 13 (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Support

1. As nominator - Technical 13 (talk) 05:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

• Oppose; I think the unadorned name should remain a topic navbox. Powers ^T 13:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Support/Oppose

• Support the move of this template. Oppose the proposed reuse of this name. It should be "{{edit javascript}}" instead, just like {{edit request}} , {{edit protected}} , {{edit semiprotected}}. It should NOT BE {{JavaScript}} or {{javascript}} ; a more beneficial use of this template location would be a formatting template that uses LUA to format JS code samples. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 06:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

• It's not an edit request itself (which would still use the main {{Edit protected}} because only admins can edit .js pages (excluding your own in your userspace, but you would need to submit a request for that_). My proposed replacement is a formating template that uses mw:Extension:SyntaxHighlight GeSHi to format JS code samples. Any formating template that uses Lua to format JS code samples would be located at Module:JavaScript. Technical 13 (talk) 07:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks for the clarification. Your nomination rationale makes it look like creating an edit request template. Making {{JavaScript}} a JS formatting template is a good idea. However, the green/red option seems mandatory, this should not be the case, if it is to provide generic javascript formatting functionality. Can it just be plain clear if it doesn't specify add or remove? -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 08:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

{{JavaScript|
   /* section */
   var section = true;
   if(!section){
      alert("TEXTALERT");
   }
}}

   /* section */
   var section = true;
   if(!section){
      alert("TEXTALERT");
   }

• If |1= is not add or remove (or one of any other predefined words), then yes is could be neutral and use the gray color (or no color or any other neutral color like yellow). Technical 13 (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

• Wait, I thought this was a navbox. Are we talking about the move of that navbox, or a protected template edit request? Epicgenius (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

• Epicgenius, we're talking about moving the navbox to Template:JavaScript navbox to make room for a new formatting template that would be more appropriate at this page name. Technical 13 (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)