Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2013/December
Proposals,December 2013
Another speedy proposal. We have enough for a Bolivian airport category. In order to build a proper hierarchy, we could use a general Bolivian building and structure category: Category:Bolivian building and structure stubs
- {{Bolivia-struct-stub}} (5 P)
- {{Bolivia-airport-stub}} (144 P), Category:Bolivian airport stubs
- {{Bolivia-church-stub}} (1 P)
- {{Bolivia-sports-venue-stub}} (11 P)
Dawynn (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Split of Category:Gelechiodea stubs
Here are a couple of speedy proposals, to help alleviate the overloaded Gelechiodea category.
- Category:Agonoxenidae stubs, to pick up {{agonoxenidae-stub}} (167 P).
- Category:Blastobasidae stubs, to pick up {{blastobasidae-stub}} (395 P).
This will take the parent category down from nearly 800 to less than 250 articles. Dawynn (talk) 11:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Exploratory templates for Category:Hypsogastropoda stubs
Propose the following new templates and potential categories. The numbers indicate population in the permanent category, not necessarily reflective of how many are truly stubs.
- {{Borsoniidae-stub}} / Category:Borsoniidae stubs
- for Category:Borsoniidae (15 C, 2 P)
- {{Clathurellidae-stub}} / Category:Clathurellidae stubs
- for Category:Clathurellidae (6 C, 1 P)
- {{Cochlespiridae-stub}} / Category:Cochlespiridae stubs
- for Category:Cochlespiridae (7 C, 2 P)
- {{Mangeliidae-stub}} / Category:Mangeliidae stubs
- for Category:Mangeliidae (31 C, 3 P)
- {{Mitromorphidae-stub}} / Category:Mitromorphidae stubs
- for Category:Mitromorphidae (Needed as family-level category for existing Category:Mitromorpha stubs)
- {{Newtoniellidae-stub}} / Category:Newtoniellidae stubs
- for Category:Newtoniellidae (27 P)
- {{Rissoinidae-stub}} / Category:Rissoinidae stubs
- for Category:Rissoinidae (108 P)
Dawynn (talk) 17:57, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
There are currently over 830 articles in this category and potentially well over 10,000. It would aid editors like myself, wishing to expand stubs, if we could break them down a bit. For starters, I'd propose doing so by suborders. Thus:
- {{Auchenorrhyncha-stub}} for stubs in Category:Auchenorrhyncha
- {{Peloridiidae-stub}} (not {{Coleorrhyncha-stub}} or {{Prosorrhyncha-stub}}) for the Peloridiidae stubs
- {{Heteroptera-stub}} for stubs in Category:Heteroptera
- {{Sternorrhyncha-stub}} for stubs in Category:Sternorrhyncha
While #2 above is problematically and would not have 60 stubs, I propose it for comprehensiveness, so that no stubs would eventually be left at Hemiptera stubs, just subcategories. --Bejnar (talk) 05:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)