Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davison Design & Development
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fish and karate (talk | contribs) at 10:12, 14 June 2006 (→[[Davison Design & Development]]: close (del)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 10:12, 14 June 2006 by Fish and karate (talk | contribs) (→[[Davison Design & Development]]: close (del))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete Proto||type 10:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- How does this article differ from any company on Wiki, this seems fair to me.
This article reads like a pomotional piece for the company. Normally that could be changed without deletion. However, in this case I see no evidence of anything close to WP:CORP, so I am recommending delete. --Hetar 17:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP and the article's a copyvio, just a copy and paste from their website. (Also, as a general rule, I don't want to see any article that pretends "inventegration" is a clever word.) - Fan1967 17:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Looks like the word has been added and deleted repeatedly. See AfD. - Fan1967 18:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - advertising. I particularly dislike people who spend a few minutes copy-and-pasting their own website and think we will then accept their article as free advertising. In this case they have done quite a bit more work since the article was prodded but it is still spam. -- RHaworth 19:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per RHaworthCaptainJ (t | c | e) 19:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ad - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 17:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.