Talk:C++Builder

Computing Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Adding a See also section

I was looking this page a few months ago because I wanted a similar application but free software. I do not know how to add to this page:

Template:Infobox Software

I added an {{Infobox Software}} template to C++Builder. I could not determine the values for these fields in the template:

latest_release_version =  |
latest_release_date =  |

I am asking anyone with knowledge of this product to complete those fields. Thanks. --Teratornis 21:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --79.196.20.78 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Spelling

According to all of the official images and literature from the product developer (Borland and now CodeGear), the name of the product is C++Builder, with no space between "C++" and "Builder". I see that most references to the product name in this article insert the space. Is there a reason for this or is this a typing mistake? Notbyworks 21:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C# Builder not popular RAD tool?

This article states:

"Other popular visual RAD tools include Delphi, JBuilder and C# Builder from Borland, and Visual Basic from Microsoft."

While the article on CSharpBuilder states this tool is not popular and is not supported:

"C#Builder's functionality has since been incorporated into Borland's Delphi and C#Builder is no longer developed as a separate application."

Which is true? --Stardancer 06:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

include<stdio.h>

main(1) { int x,y avg;

 printif("please enter x and y:\n");

scanf("%d%d",&x,&y); avg=(x+y)/2 printf("the avg=%d",avg); —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.135.105.66 (talk) 02:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C++ Builder 5-6 was better, because faster and stable. Your article maybe old. Wikipedia prefer fresh and current state.--93.80.66.232 (talk) 20:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fight the hype!

Article contains too much hype. Some one should do something about it. "C++Builder includes tools that allow true drag-and-drop visual development, making programming easier by incorporating a WYSIWYG GUI builder into its IDE." Oh, really? I thought they only provide the false drag and drop, and make development really tough. BS like that must be deleted/edited to fit the style of article, and not infomercial (a kind of comercial that tries to make you think it is a useful information, and not yet another hype). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.139.8.77 (talk) 08:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]