Talk:Timeline of computer animation/to do

Look this ! http://imdb.com/title/tt0136748/

All that does is confirm the movie exists. The "trivia" item claiming that the film is the first 100% digital film ever made is NOT a reliable source, as you could have been the one who submitted it. However, the claim of being the "first 100% digital film" is invalid, as (even if you exclude Toy Story, which you shouldn't), that also leaves out the VeggieTales home video, and any of the Pixar short films. You need to find a RELIABLE source. TheRealFennShysa 17:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source ? Nor the Wikipedia is a source that if can trust! After all of accounts any person can “affirm the absolute truth” more does not go to modify this wrong timeline, therefore elea she is made by Americans for Americans, who live in its proper realities. Nobody denies the importance of the Toy Story, but before writing a “absolute truth” it searches with impartial tenacity and either.

By reliable source, I mean an article in a reputable magzine, such as (in this case) Animation World or Cinefex that backs up your claim. All you've done is constantly enter that film with no corroboration, references, or proof of your claim. This is not an American vs. non-American issue, as Japanese entries share spaces on this page, and they've backed up their claims. You have not. You've offered nothing at all, other than a dogged insistence to ramrod the info into the article. And until I see some corroboration of your claims, I'm going to remove it, as nothing I've found from reliable sources backs up any claims you've made. TheRealFennShysa 21:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]