Talk:Quantum finite automaton
Appearance
![]() | Mathematics C‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
language
Its been a while since my CS classes but shouldn't the state machine be listed as:
(1*01*0)*
This (1*01*01*)* expanded would become 1*01*01*1*01*01*...
1*=1*1* so it seems redundent.
Mdozturk 19:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- No I think its correct as written. Look at the transition diagram: there are two distinct zero transitions. 99.153.64.179 (talk) 17:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
ouch
This makes my head hurt. Someone please write articles like these in... English, please.
- OK, I just added a long "non-technical" introduction; I hope it makes things clear(er). 99.153.64.179 (talk) 17:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)