Jump to content

Talk:Tensor network theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andrea Trementozzi (talk | contribs) at 21:32, 23 November 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMedicine Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 2

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 1

  • Most of your links are good, but I think that it would be helpful to have a direct link to the word "tensor" itself so people can look up what that is if they do not know.

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 1

  • There is no course banner on the talk page, also there are a lot of pictures on your page, which is not necessarily a bad thing, but maybe consider prioritizing which ones are really necessary. (?)

8. Writing: 1

  • Some grammatical inconsistencies, in the "Example section" in particular... "By calculating the neuronal network transformations between the sensory input into the vestibular system and the subsequent motor response, a metric tensor representing the neuronal network." Not really sure if this makes sense grammatically.

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 1

  • Not too sure how to make this "outstanding", but I do think it is a very interesting topic and I think you did a great job with it!

_______________ Total: 16 out of 20

Comments:

  • Maybe you could consider adding some more sections to your topic to expand the text a little more. I'm not sure how much information there is on this though, so I'm not sure how feasible that would be.
  • Great job so far though!

Andrea Trementozzi (talk) 21:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]