Talk:Astronomical Image Processing System

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comments

The existing page has an interesting history with respect to the development and coding of AIPS, but virtually nothing about what it does, or why anyone would actually use it. I was involved in programming and porting (cf pgmtofits), but I know nothing at all about use, other than the occasional output I saw. Whbjr (talk) 02:33, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, needs to be rewritten from acronym into English too, and a less chatty tone perhaps. We generally avoid the first person for example. W Nowicki (talk) 00:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]