User talk:PhillyPartTwo

Welcome

Hello, PhillyPartTwo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MTV Unplugged

Hello PhillyPartTwo, I saw your edits at MTV Unplugged, but I could not find any references regarding the Neil Young Freedom tour being an official MTV Unplugged show. Or is it that in that tour he performed some acoustic versions of his songs? Thank you! --Kio 02:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the only reference I have is that I watched the thing myself at the time and I still have it on VHS... that's as good as I can do!

I have no doubts that Neil Young performed in its Freedom tour (and that you saw it)... but, was it really a MTV Unplugged performmance? I believe the Freedom tour began before the MTV unplugged series started... --Kio 01:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jeff Garlin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary usage

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Ohmpandya (Talk) 23:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of CBS Mandate

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is CBS Mandate. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBS Mandate (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Lee

Your edits have been reverted. The trade is not official, and it could be called off if the physicals don't go well. Until it is official, Lee is an Indian. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How many sites that say 'done deal', including the Phillies and Indians sites do you want to see? EVERY trade is not final until physicals. The trade is done. The trade is final. It has passed the Commissioner's office. If someone fails the physical the trade is canceled. It is not dependent on the physical. The trade is complete. If the physical is failed, then the trade is nullified, but the trade did happen. Sorry to burst your bubble. -- Me, now.

If a player fails a physical, it nullifies the trade, meaning the players don't change teams. Therefore, if Carlos Carrasco fails his physical, Cliff Lee remains an Indian; the deal doesn't go through. Therefore we don't change his team until we know the deal is official. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No point arguing with a stubborn mind. You win. It's never stopped any other player ever on here from being changed upon official word of his trade/signing, but you can feel all kinds of important and keep it Cleveland for 10 more hours. Enjoy. - Me, now.

Toyota recall

The recall is in progress or planned for several countries, not just the USA. By including that and other information that you have done and the article will be nicer! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have already noted the recall in Europe and China on the page. I don't have enough information to expand at this time, but I will keep an eye on it. The acceleration incidents seem to have been confined to the US.

ITN for 2010 Toyota Vehicle Recall

On 30 January 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Toyota Vehicle Recall, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! 21655 ^{ταλκ/01ҁ} 00:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WaitingForArmytoDie.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WaitingForArmytoDie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shubinator (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Do not remove FfD entries or tags indicating FfD listings from file pages. Continue to do so and you will be blocked. ÷seresin 04:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:5Portraits3.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:5Portraits3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Blurpeace 05:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mayerson Law Offices, P.C.

I now see that this is an established office and has a Wikipedia article. If it was up to me I wouldn't use their website as a source; I'd probably find something a bit more neutral. Something a bit more removed from the business of making money off these kinds of incidents and accident articles that you're working on. Catch you around. Dawnseeker2000 16:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not spam nor promotion. This is legitimate legal and information subject matter. I do not represent nor work for any company or firm.

Domonic Brown

Crossing Broad is in no way a reliable source for the Domonic Brown call-up. You need to wait until it's officially announced by the team, per WP:CRYSTAL. Stop inserting information that's not verifiable by reliable sources. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 18:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Already changed source to USA Today. PhillyPartTwo

That's a community-edited forum, not a reliable source, regardless of its being hosted on USA Today. — KV5 • Talk • 18:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced MSNBC as well. - PhillyPartTwo

Fine dude, you win. If you really want your 'special' writing in the article instead of mine, so be it. This clearly is quite important for you for some reason. You could had just undid or put back my edits, but it's fine whateverdude.

It doesn't have anything to do with "my writing" or "your writing"; it had to do with sourcing. Once I found a reliable source, I put the information back in the article. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is never about being "right" or "wrong"; it's about being factually accurate and neutral. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 18:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If that helps you sleep at night. - PhillyPartTwo

File source problem with File:LawBuilding3.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LawBuilding3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Feith Systems Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Feith Systems Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Don Feith and Frig the Dragon.png

A tag has been placed on File:Don Feith and Frig the Dragon.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 18:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Feith Systems HQ Exterior.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Feith Systems HQ Exterior.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 18:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Phillies Phanatic2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Phillies Phanatic2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 18:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rhoad'sCemetary.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rhoad'sCemetary.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 18:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Feith Systems HQ Exterior 2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Feith Systems HQ Exterior 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files with false or lacking copyright and source information, as you did at File:Feith Systems HQ Exterior 2.jpg, you may be blocked from editing. Please make sure you have read and understood our image use policy before making any further uploads. If you have questions, ask at the copyright question page. Eeekster (talk) 21:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo 2.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo 2.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo 2.png

A tag has been placed on File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo 2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:BL Original WhiteSpace.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BL Original WhiteSpace.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at File talk:Feith Systems HQ Exterior.jpg, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Feith Logo smaller.png

Thanks for uploading File:Feith Logo smaller.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This issue has been corrected, and tagged with the tags Copy to Commons by Sfan00 IMG and PD-textlogo. --MPH (talk) 15:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Feith Logo smaller.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feith Logo smaller.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Blurred Lines 00:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Feith Logo smaller.png

Thank you for uploading File:Feith Logo smaller.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Blurred Lines 00:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This issue has been corrected, and tagged with the tags Copy to Commons by Sfan00 IMG and PD-textlogo.

Orphaned non-free image File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo 3.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feith BridgeLogiQ Logo 3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Blurred Lines 00:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file has been removed from your userpage, user talk page, or other page because it was licensed as non-free. Wikipedia's non-free policy states that Copyrighted images under fair use are only allowed to be used in articles about the subject of the image, and only if no free equivalent is available. For example they are not allowed to be used on user pages, in lists, or (typically) in biographies of living people. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Wikipedia's non-free content policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of non-freeimages. Further use of these images will be considered vandalism, and shall be treated as such. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Blurred Lines 00:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]