Jump to content

Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors/poll2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jallan (talk | contribs) at 19:24, 10 September 2004 (→(B) Yes, but only for a trial period of two months). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Introduction

This poll is to decide whether we should adopt Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors. If adopted, the policy will not be set in stone and may change in the future in light of the community's experience with it. Please vote bearing this in mind.

Voting starts on midday, UTC, September 3, 2004

Poll closes midday UTC September 17, 2004

This poll will not change once voting has begun. Please make any poll modifications before 3 September.

Question 1

Should Wikipedia adopt Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors?

Please only vote one option. Votes for (a) will be added to (b) if neither (a) nor (b) receives a consensus.

(A) Yes

  1. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:41, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]] 19:38, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  3. Jwrosenzweig 19:53, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  4. Austin Hair 20:54, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

(B) Yes, but only for a trial period of two months

  1. —No-One Jones m 18:45, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  2. Jmabel 23:00, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
  3. Ardonik.talk() 04:17, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC) Concerned that the 2d + 3 vs. d policy in the final section tips the scale in favor of dissenting admins, but willing to try it out.
  4. Conti|✉ 11:38, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
  5. Jallan 19:24, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

(c) No

  1. Gzornenplatz 17:54, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
  2. Filiocht 10:32, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) Looks like a recipe for a troll banquet to me. Do we have firm figures on the level of disruptive/antisocial behaviour on Wikipedia? A decision like this should be purely fact driven.
  3. -- orthogonal 12:55, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC) Too arbitrary, especially as there is no effective way to remove abusive sysops.

Question 2

Please do not unilaterally add questions. Propose secondary questions on the talk pages and allow 48 hours of discussion to craft proposals. You will get a better outcome if you let others help you knock off any easily fixable sticking points first!

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dealing_with_disruptive_or_antisocial_editors/poll2&oldid=5798977"