Jump to content

Talk:Back to Basics: Live and Down Under

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 23:21, 31 October 2013 (Transcluding GA review). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Maintained

Release date

Is the release date real? BritandBeyonce 06:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the source for all the release details? Mrincredible 08:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, look at the reference. *Hippi ippi 02:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What about this source? --Britand&Beyonce (talkcontribs) 08:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Back To Basics - Live & Down Under.jpg

Image:Back To Basics - Live & Down Under.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Spain is released on 5th December. Here's the link but it's in Spanish. http://www.click2music.es/verdisco2.asp?id=655&d=88697190399+&o=886971903997&a=CHRISTINA+AGUILERA&t=BACK+TO+BASICS:+LIVE+AND+DOWN+UNDER&w=www.christinaaguilera.com&pg= —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.225.12.44 (talk) 14:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:51l09FAfKbL SS500 .jpg

Image:51l09FAfKbL SS500 .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do we need to write the whole synopsis of the DVD in the article?! I think it's not very useful!!!Olliyeah (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

(talk) 05:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for charts

Australia
Austria
Belgium Wallonia
Belgium Flanders
Czech
Dutch
Swiss
US

(talk) 11:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Back to Basics: Live and Down Under/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Вик Ретлхед (talk · contribs) 23:16, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes
  • the fourth video release→the fourth video album
  • was released for purchase→can you provide a luckier solution?
  • at 10 PM; this seems sufficient in the intro, however it should stay in the "Background" section
  • unlink studio album (common word)
  • included material
  • territories→countries
  • first-week→first week
  • features several bonus contents; is it bonus tracks or something else? "Contents" seems like a wide subject.
  • as well as→and
  • which would have opening acts such as The Pussycat Dolls and Danity Kane.→you can slightly re-word this sentence
  • the tour was filmed and was released as a DVD→the concert was filmed and released as a DVD.
  • video made it premiere→had its premiere or premiered on VH1
  • drop "television channel"
  • was first released officially→was officially released
  • A day later→the next day or one day later
  • remove CD Universe description since it's a music seller, not a professional publication (not to mention that the text is unauthorized)
  • "damn good" rating? 7/10 would be more appropriate and neutral
  • In Australia, the DVD debuted and peaked at number 2 on the ARIA Music DVD Chart on February 25, 2008 and remained on its peak for two weeks→The DVD was released on February 25, 2008 in Australia. It debuted and peaked at number 2 on the ARIA Music DVD Chart, where it stayed for two weeks.
  • reached it peak→reached its peak
  • and remained on the top ten for on week→and remained in the top ten for one week.
  • In the following week, it fell to number 3.→It fell to number 3 the following week.
  • re-build the "Certifications" section so that the actual shipments can be viewed (see Youthanasia for example)
  • might add a link to Discogs at the "External links" section
  • you should take another look at the prose since there are some other minor mistakes I haven't listed
You can mark the things you've addressed with  Done. Good luck.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since there is no feedback from the nominator in nearly a week, and since the GA waiting list is way too long, I'm closing the nomination as failed.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 23:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]